Top 10 Python Website Builders In 2024

By investigating the 10 Best Python Website Builders available in 2024, this guide is built on extensive research, incorporating 10 years of website building experience, expert reviews, and professional advice. 

It’s designed to help you choose the most efficient and effective Python-based website-building tools, meeting the specific needs of modern web developers and businesses.

10 Best Python Website Builders Available In 2024

BlueBream

Main features

• Python WSGI Compatibility Emphasis: Seamless Python ecosystem integration with middleware and plug-in ease.
• Testing Frameworks (Unit and Functional): Comprehensive testing tools for application reliability and performance assurance.
• Plugged Security Mechanism: Flexible, customizable security model for diverse security strategies.
• XHTML-Compliant Template Language: Standards-compliant, cross-browser compatible web page development.
• Automatic Form Generation Tool: Streamlined form creation, enhancing development efficiency and accuracy.
• Zope Component Architecture (ZCA): Modular, reusable component development promoting code organization and maintainability.

Pros

• WSGI Compatibility: Focus on ensuring compatibility with the Web Server Gateway Interface for Python integration.
• Testing Frameworks: Utilize frameworks specialized in unit and functional testing.
• Security Improvement: Employ key methods to enhance security measures.
• Template Development: Use XHTML-compliant language for template creation.
• Form Generation: Implement tools for automatic form generation.
• Zope Component Architecture: Apply ZCA for robust, reusable component creation, emphasizing the separation of concerns principle.

Cons

• High Learning Curve: BlueBream is challenging for newcomers, especially those new to Python or Zope.
• Complex for Simple Tasks: May be overly complex for small-scale projects.
• Less Popular: Lower popularity than frameworks like Django or Flask, resulting in fewer resources.
• Performance Issues: Can be slower, especially for large, complex projects.
• Scalability Limitations: Not always ideal for high-traffic applications requiring extensive scaling.
• Support and Resources: Limited support and resources due to complexity and lack of popularity.

The verdict

BlueBream is best suited for experienced developers who require a sophisticated and scalable framework for complex, large-scale web applications, especially those familiar with the Zope 3 framework. Its advanced features and strong security mechanisms are ideal for enterprise-level projects, though its complexity may be daunting for beginners or those working on simpler web projects.

Django

Main features

• Built-In Authentication System: Robust, ready-to-use user authentication for secure access management.
• Efficient URL System: Intuitive, powerful URL mapping for streamlined web navigation.
• Object-Oriented Database Management: Optimal data storage and recovery through object-oriented database design.
• Automatic Admin Interface: Easy content management with customizable edit, add, delete functionalities.
• Versatile Caching Framework: Supports multiple caching mechanisms for enhanced performance.

Pros

• URL Pattern Definition: Facilitates defining URL patterns for applications.
• Authentication System: Includes an integrated authentication system.
• Effective URL Scheme: Offers an easy-to-use URL scheme.
• Database Language Support: Provides object-oriented programming for optimal data storage and recovery.
• Automatic Admin Interface: Allows customizable modifications in data management.
• Cache Mechanisms: Supports various caching frameworks for enhanced performance.

Cons

• Not for Small Projects: Better suited for large-scale rather than smaller projects.
• Performance Issues: Can be slow with high request volumes.
• Lacks Rails’ Conventions: Does not have specific coding conventions like Rails.
• Requires In-Depth Knowledge: Effective use demands a thorough understanding of the framework.

The verdict

Django is an ideal choice for developers seeking a powerful, yet user-friendly Python web framework that can handle both small-scale projects and complex, high-traffic websites efficiently. Its extensive documentation, strong community support, and a wide array of built-in features make it a go-to option for both beginners and experienced developers alike.

Grok

Main features

• Robust, Extensible Web Application Foundation: Solid base for creating scalable and adaptable web solutions.
• Zope 3 Utilization: Empowers developers with the advanced capabilities of Zope 3.
• Robust Object Database: Efficient data storage with a strong object database.
• Integrated Data Security: Built-in security features for application protection and user-specific access control.
• Grok Component Architecture: Reduces development unpredictability through a structured component system.
• Custom Web Application Building Blocks: Essential tools and resources for tailored business web application development.

Pros

• Sophisticated Web Apps: Offers a solid foundation for developing complex and adaptable web applications.
• Zope 3 Utilization: Enables use of Zope 3’s advanced features by web developers.
• Object Storage Database: Incorporates a robust object storage database.
• Data Security: Features integrated data security for application protection and user access control.
• Grok Component Architecture: Reduces development uncertainty with Grok architecture.
• Building Blocks for Custom Apps: Provides essential components for creating custom web applications for businesses.

Cons

• Readability Issues: Code hidden in parent classes may lead to elegance but can reduce readability and comprehension, as code isn’t all in one place.
• Use Case for CBVs: Class-Based Views (CBVs) might be excessive for unique view functionalities and are better suited for reusable code across multiple views.

The verdict

Grok is well-suited for developers who prefer convention over configuration and are looking for a straightforward yet powerful Python web framework. Its design, which leverages the strengths of the Zope Toolkit, makes it particularly appealing for those who value rapid development with a focus on agile and intuitive coding practices.

TurboGears

Main features

• Function Decorator-Based Features: Simplifies implementation with decorator-driven functionality.
• Multi-Database Support: Versatile database compatibility for diverse data management needs.
• Command-Line Tool Accessibility: User-friendly command-line interface for efficient management.
• MochiKit JavaScript Library Integration: Enhanced frontend functionality with MochiKit integration.
• MVC Architecture with PasteScript Templates: Organized, template-driven development aligning with MVC principles.
• ToscaWidgets for Frontend-Server Coordination: Streamlines frontend design and server deployment with ToscaWidgets.

Pros

• Function Decorators: Features are implemented as function decorators for efficiency.
• Database Support: Offers support for multiple databases.
• Command-Line Utilities: Includes accessible command-line utilities.
• MochiKit for JavaScript: Integrates MochiKit library for enhanced JavaScript functionality.
• MVC Architecture: Utilizes MVC style architecture and PasteScript templates.
• ToscaWidgets: Employs ToscaWidgets for improved front-end design and server deployment.

Cons

• Framework Expansion Challenge: Enlarging the framework, when necessary, can present challenges.

The verdict

TurboGears is an excellent fit for developers looking for a comprehensive Python web framework that emphasizes simplicity and productivity. It’s suitable for a wide range of web application projects, from small-scale to large, and appeals to those who value an integrated stack of tools and components for efficient development.

Bottle

Main features

• Simplified Syntax for URL Mapping: Clean, dynamic URL routing with easy-to-use syntax.
• Pythonic Template Engine: Fast, intuitive built-in template support.
• WSGI and CGI Compatibility: Flexible WSGI framework with accessible internals, compatible with CGI.
• Easy HTTP Data Access: Simplified access to cookies, file uploads, and HTTP metadata.
• Built-In HTTP Server Support: Compatibility with various WSGI-capable HTTP servers, including glue and fapws3.
• Speed Optimizations for Performance: Enhanced for fast testing and high-performance applications.

Pros

• Simple URL Mapping: Uses simpler syntax for flawless, dynamic URL routing.
• Swift and Python Support: Features an inbuilt template engine compatible with Swift and Python.
• WSGI and CGI Compatibility: Compatible with WSGI and CGI, offering accessible internals.
• HTTP Metadata Access: Easy access to data, cookies, file uploads, and HTTP metadata.
• Included HTTP Server: Supports various WSGI-capable HTTP servers like glue, fapws3, and flup.
• Performance Enhancements: Offers acceleration features for testing and high performance.

Cons

• Size Limitation: Best suited for small applications, relying only on the standard Python library.
• Limited Community Resources: The framework’s community offers limited documentation and usage examples.

The verdict

Bottle is an excellent choice for developers who need a lightweight and simple Python web framework for building small to medium-sized web applications. Its minimalistic design and ease of use make it particularly attractive for beginners or those working on projects where a straightforward, no-frills approach is desired.

Tornado

Main features

• 3rd-Party Authentication Implementation: Enables integration with external authentication and authorization systems.
• Real-Time, Non-Blocking Services: Offers top-notch, real-time services with non-blocking HTTP clients.
• High-Quality Output Assurance: Consistently delivers superior output quality.
• Interpretation and Localization Support: Facilitates translation and adaptation to different languages and locales.
• User Authentication and Web Templates: Provides robust user authentication mechanisms and versatile web template options.

Pros

• Third-Party Integration: Supports implementation of third-party authentication and authorization.
• High-Quality Services: Offers better quality, real-time services, and non-blocking HTTP clients.
• Result Quality: Consistently produces high-quality outcomes.
• Translation Support: Provides assistance in translation and localization.
• User Authentication and Templates: Includes support for user authentication and web templates.

Cons

• Class-Based Views Limitation: Using Class-Based Views (CBVs) may be excessive for unique view functionalities and are more suited for code reuse across multiple views.

The verdict

Tornado is ideally suited for developers who are building highly scalable, non-blocking web applications, particularly those that require handling long-lived network connections, such as for real-time web services. Its robust asynchronous features and efficient handling of concurrent connections make it a preferred choice for projects that demand high performance and speed, like chat applications or live data streaming services.

Pyramid

Main features

• Scalability for All App Sizes: Efficient performance across both small and large applications.
• Routes-Based URL Mapping: Configurable URL dispatch and WebHelpers for effective URL mapping.
• HTML Structure Validation and Generation: Tools for validating and generating HTML structures.
• Comprehensive Templating and Asset Specifications: Extensive options for templating and asset management.
• Robust Testing and Documentation: Strong support for testing with detailed data documentation.
• Flexible Authentication and Authorization: Adaptable systems for user authentication and access control.

Pros

• Versatility: Performs well with both small and large applications.
• URL Mapping: Utilizes Routes setup for URL dispatch and WebHelpers for HTML structure validation and generation.
• Template Design: Offers comprehensive template design and asset management.
• Documentation and Support: Provides thorough testing, support, and extensive data documentation.
• Flexible Security: Supports flexible authorization and authentication methods.

Cons

• Advanced Tool Preparation: Pyramid framework installation is complex and time-consuming.
• Requires Expertise: Installation and setup require extensive technical knowledge.
• SQLAlchemy Suitability: Not necessary or beneficial for smaller projects.

The verdict

Pyramid is a versatile Python web framework that caters to a diverse audience of developers. It’s an ideal choice for those who value flexibility, as it allows for a wide range of project sizes and complexities, from small applications to large, enterprise-level systems, making it accessible to both beginners and experienced developers looking for a framework that adapts to their specific needs and preferences.

CherryPy

Main features

• HTTP/1.1-Compliant, WSGI Webserver: Stable, thread-pooled server adhering to HTTP/1.1 standards.
• Simultaneous Multi-Port HTTP Servers: Capability to run multiple HTTP servers concurrently on various ports.
• Wide Python Compatibility: Supports Python 2.7+, 3.5+, PyPy, Jython, and Android platforms.
• Integrated Tools for Web Development: Comprehensive built-in features for encoding, sessions, caching, and more.
• Versatile Configuration System: Flexible and powerful configuration options for both developers and deployers.
• Profiling and Testing Tools: Inbuilt support for profiling, coverage analysis, and testing.

Pros

• Webserver Standards: Compliant with HTTP/1.1, featuring a thread-pooling WSGI webserver.
• Multiple HTTP Servers: Capable of operating several HTTP servers simultaneously.
• Wide Compatibility: Supports Python 2.7+, Python 3.5+, PyPy, Jython, and Android.
• Integrated Utilities: Includes utilities for encoding, sessions, caching, authentication, and static content.
• Robust Configuration System: Designed for both developers and administrators.
• Testing and Profiling Support: Offers integrated support for profiling, coverage, and testing.

Cons

• Documentation Gap: The framework’s main drawback is the lack of comprehensive documentation, making it challenging for beginners to use effectively.

The verdict

CherryPy is tailored for developers who prefer a minimalist approach to web development in Python. It’s an excellent choice for those who want a lightweight and straightforward framework that simplifies the creation of web applications while allowing for customization and integration with other tools when needed.

Web2Py

Main features

• Convention Over Configuration: Streamlines rapid development without extensive setup.
• MVC Architecture Support: Simplifies development with a clear model-view-controller structure.
• Relational and NoSQL Database Compatibility: Flexibility to work with popular database systems.
• Web-Based IDE: Enhances productivity with features for file editing, testing, and issue tracking.
• Inclusive Development Tools (“Useful Batteries”): Equipped with essential tools for efficient web app creation.
• Robust Security Measures: Proactively addresses major vulnerabilities to safeguard web applications.

Pros

• Rapid Development: Facilitates quick web development with a focus on configuration.
• MVC Architecture: Supports MVC architecture to streamline development.
• Database Interaction: Enables interaction with common relational and NoSQL databases.
• Web-based IDE: Provides an IDE for efficient web development tasks.
• Built-in Features: Includes essential tools for building web applications independently.
• Security Focus: Addresses major vulnerabilities to enhance application security.

Cons

• Rigid Plugin System: The framework has an inflexible plug-in system.
• Data Model Management: Experiences challenges in managing system loading for data models.
• No Python 3 Support: Lacks support for Python 3.

The verdict

Web2Py is an ideal choice for developers seeking a user-friendly and all-in-one Python web framework that minimizes complexity. It caters to both beginners and experienced developers looking for a quick and efficient way to develop web applications without the need for extensive setup or complex configurations.

Flask

Main features

• Development Server and Debugger: Comes with an in-built server and tools for debugging.
• RESTful Request Handling: Efficient management of RESTful requests for web services.
• Unit Testing Support: Facilitates quality assurance with integrated testing capabilities.
• Jinja2 Templating System: Utilizes Jinja2 for advanced templating features.
• WSGI 1.0 Compliance: Fully adheres to the WSGI 1.0 standard for web applications.
• Extensive Community Extensions: A wide range of community-driven extensions for easy functionality integration.

Pros

• Development Tools: Includes a built-in development server and debugger.
• RESTful Dispatching: Supports RESTful request dispatching for efficient web services.
• Unit Testing: Integrates support for unit testing to ensure code quality.
• Jinja2 Templating: Utilizes Jinja2 for advanced templating features.
• WSGI Compliance: Fully compatible with WSGI 1.0 standards.
• Extensibility: Offers numerous community-developed extensions for added functionality.

Cons

• Expertise Requirement: This framework demands skilled Flask developers due to its need for detailed attention and a deep understanding of complex relationships.

The verdict

Flask is well-suited for developers who prefer a lightweight, micro web framework in Python that provides the flexibility to build web applications with minimal overhead. It’s an excellent choice for those who value simplicity, want to work with a framework that follows the WSGI standard, and appreciate the freedom to select and integrate components as needed for their specific project requirements.

FAQs

Final words

Our overview of the 10 Best Python Website Builders in 2024 shows that these platforms have been evaluated based on years of expert reviews, user experiences, and professional insights. They offer a blend of efficiency and advanced capabilities, making them suitable choices for developers and businesses looking to leverage Python’s power in web development.